Are Any Drugs Legal
In the context of immigration to the United States, the term “legalization” is used colloquially to refer to a process in which a person who is in the country illegally can obtain a lawful permanent resident. Since 1929, U.S. law has provided for the legalization process known as the Registry, which simply requires the applicant to prove that they have been in the country continuously since a certain “registration date” (originally 1921; currently 1972) and is not inadmissible for other reasons (criminal history, etc.).   One legalization proposal that was recently widely discussed [when?] was the DREAM law. Uruguay is one of the few countries that has never criminalized the possession of drugs for personal use. Since 1974, the law has not set quantitative limits and leaves it to the judge to determine whether the intention was a personal use. Once the judge has determined that the quantity in possession is for personal use, there are no penalties.  Considering that legalization would likely lead to an increase in the supply of drugs, the standard economic model predicts that the amount of drugs used would increase and prices would fall. : 428 However, Andrew E. Clark, an economist who has studied the effects of drug legalization, suggests that a specific tax or sin tax would counteract the increase in consumption. : 3 In addition, legalization would reduce the cost of mass incarceration of marginalized communities that are disproportionately affected. Of those arrested for drug possession or drug-related offenses, the majority of those arrested are black or Hispanic.
 Finally, what would happen to the major suppliers of illicit drugs if restrictions on the commercial sale of these drugs were lifted in some or all major markets? Would trafficking organizations adapt and become legal businesses or turn to other illegal businesses? What would happen to the source countries? Would they benefit or would new producers and manufacturers suddenly emerge elsewhere? Such questions have not even been asked systematically, let alone seriously studied. If the death or serious bodily injury results from the use of a controlled substance that has been illegally distributed, the person convicted of spreading the substance is liable to a mandatory life sentence and fines of up to $8 million. The United States is currently in the midst of a shift in the way it perceives legal recreational drugs or “soft drugs.” We are quick to reach countries with more relaxed views on drug law, such as Portugal. This is in stark contrast to the ongoing war on drugs, which was waged unsuccessfully in the United States decades ago. In 2016, Australia legalized medical cannabis at the federal level. Selling any amount (not buying) remains a criminal act. Possession of “more than one small” amount of marijuana can result in a prison sentence of up to one year. For other illicit drugs, the penalty can be up to two years. Trade and production (with the exception of growing up to five marijuana plants) will be punished more severely.  On the 22nd. In February 2008, Honduran President Manuel Zelaya called on the United States to legalize drugs to prevent, as he said, the majority of violent murders in Honduras.
Honduras is used by cocaine traffickers as a transit point between Colombia and the United States. Honduras, with a population of 7 million people affected and an average of 8 to 10 murders per day, with about 70% attributable to this international drug trade. The same problem is occurring in Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica and Mexico, according to Zelaya.  Persons convicted of possession of drugs under federal or state law are not eligible for federal grants and loans or participation in government-sponsored research grants or contracts for up to one year after the first conviction and up to five years after the second conviction; The penalty for drug distribution is the loss of benefits for five years after the first conviction, 10 years after the second and permanently after the third.* Harm reduction refers to a set of public health measures aimed at reducing the harmful effects of recreational drug use and other high-risk activities. Harm reduction is proposed as a useful perspective alongside more conventional approaches to supply and demand reduction.  Many proponents argue that prohibitionist laws criminalize people because they suffer from illness and cause harm, for example, by forcing addicts to obtain drugs of unknown purity from unreliable criminal sources at high prices, increasing the risk of overdose and death.  Critics are concerned that tolerating risky or illegal behaviour sends a message to the community that such behaviour is acceptable.   Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM) is leading the country in the search for smart, effective and less punitive strategies to prevent marijuana use and prevent a new large public health-focused marijuana industry. Below, SAM co-founder Kevin Sabet, PhD, presents the false dichotomy of legalization and criminalization: opponents of more permissive regimes doubt that black market activity and the problems associated with it will disappear or even fall very sharply. However, to answer this question, the details of the regulatory system, especially the delivery conditions, must be known as before. When drugs are sold openly on a commercial basis and prices are close to production and distribution costs, the chances of illegal undercutting seem rather slim.
Under a more restrictive regime, such as state-controlled outlets or medical prescription systems, illegal sources of care would be more likely to persist or expand to meet legally unmet demand. In short, the desire to control access to basic consumption must be weighed against the resulting black market opportunities. Systems that risk a persistent black market require more questions – about how the black market works again over time, whether it is likely to be cheaper than existing markets and, more generally, whether the trade-off with other benefits is still worth it. After the 2018 midterm elections, Michigan legalized the private use of recreational marijuana.  In 2021, New York legalized adult cannabis when it passed the Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act (MRTA).  Many arguments seem to make legalization a compelling alternative to today`s prohibition policy.