Legal Point of View Strengths

What has been the biggest change in your daily routine since you joined the company? As Chief Legal Officer, I lead our litigation department. This means looking for ways for our service to increase the efficiency of processing and resolving cases on a daily basis. As a high-volume law firm, we must not only meet face-to-face with lawyers to discuss issues with their files, but also respond to emergencies that arise, look for ways to mitigate risk to the firm, and communicate with clients or our CFO about business objectives. I`m always working on a small drop load, so it can get very busy sometimes. But I have a great team, and they help make it happen. The criminal justice system in America is fundamentally designed to ensure that the accused is protected until due process is conducted in court. This gives Americans many rights that are not granted in other countries. However, the institution of the court – influenced by societal pressures and a new generation of legal experts – must constantly reassess how unintentional institutional bias can affect the outcome of a court case. Danielle Smyth is a writer and content marketer from upstate New York.

She holds a Master of Science in Publishing from Pace University. His experience includes years of work in insurance, workers` compensation, disability and background investigations. She has written on legal issues for a number of other clients. She owns her own content marketing agency, Wordsmyth Creative Content Marketing, and enjoys writing legal articles and blogs for clients in related industries. If you want to learn more about your personal strengths and opportunities for growth, look for an assessment tool. Here are some popular tools: “Working with independent lawyers opens the door to many qualified and talented gig lawyers who can help you expand your service offering and do more legal work. By leveraging the expertise of others, you can offer more to your clients, take on extra work, and grow your practice. To understand the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. criminal justice system, it is important to define some critical terms used in the U.S.

legal code. These include the presumption of innocence, due process, evidence and an appropriate defence. The training of lawyers often puts them in a drawer. Understanding your own strengths and preferences can help you build a law practice that aligns with you. Was it your career goal to reach the management levels of a law firm? I didn`t have the specific goal of being chief legal officer. I just knew I wanted to make a difference. My advice to anyone who wants to be part of corporate leadership is to make sure you know your strengths and weaknesses and look for ways to create unique value. For example, in the trial of a man accused of robbing a bank, the judge would likely consider his personality traits irrelevant because they have little to do with the crime committed, but may be used to influence or convict the jury against him. Evidence must also be admissible, meaning that it was obtained legally and its integrity is preserved. Evidence obtained through illegal searches or evidence that may have been manipulated is excluded from the case.

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are external online distributors of ALM`s extensive collection of current and archived versions of legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law clients may access and use ALM content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, New York Law Journal and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information. “You should have a good idea of your strengths and weaknesses. It is very important to know when you are the most appropriate person to do something, and when not, when something should and should not be delegated. “What quality do you think every business leader should have? A link between self-awareness and emotional intelligence. You should have a good idea of your strengths and weaknesses. It is very important to know when you are the most appropriate person to do something, and when not, when something should and should not be delegated. I think emotional intelligence goes a long way in everything we do, whether it`s communicating with your clients, your staff, and even opposing lawyers.

The relationships you build are critical to long-term success. In addition, the accused are protected from threats or forced confessions, as such evidence was allegedly obtained illegally and therefore excluded from the trial. The accused are also protected from the court of public opinion and are entitled to a qualified legal defence. These rights seem fundamental to American citizens, but the fact remains that there are many countries in the world that do not give these rights to citizens. Some of the strengths of the U.S. criminal justice system are also weaknesses in the criminal justice system. American society is plagued by underlying social currents, resulting in institutions, including the court, prone to racism, sexism, and classism. For example, studies show that Black defendants receive harsher sentences than White defendants for the same crime; This kind of subliminal racism is not open, making it difficult to counter even in court. This has led to an unfair balance in the detention of persons belonging to minority groups and is very difficult to remedy. This can raise an important question: how can someone defend the accused when he or she is actually guilty of the crime – especially in extreme cases of violence, corruption and depravity? In these cases, the legal defense is there to ensure that the rules of law are properly followed and to highlight how easily the public can rush to ignore due process.

In any case, an adequate defence is important to guarantee the rights of every individual. A person in the United States has the right to due process; This includes, of course, a proper defense attorney who stands up against the prosecution`s charges and tries to prove his innocence. Without an adequate defence, the accused may become a victim of the public will, prejudice and false assumptions of the prosecution. The defendant is entitled to a qualified legal defence. The criminal justice system in the United States is considered one of the strongest in the world – but with inequality and biased practices rooted in many aspects of the law, these strengths also reflect weaknesses. The fundamental concepts of American law are aimed at protecting the fundamental human rights of the accused and ensuring a fair trial as far as possible; They are regarded worldwide as leading examples of human rights protection. As is often the case, the concept may differ from practice. To view this content, please continue with their websites. Evidence in law is any type of evidence that is legally used in court to show the judge and jury (alleged) facts relevant to the case. Proof is paramount in any criminal case; Through evidence, the prosecution and defense present their arguments to convince the judge and jury of the truth. Evidence is essential for the prosecution to prove that the accused – presumed innocent – is indeed guilty. In addition, the very wealthy have the distinct advantage of being able to post bail, hire the most powerful lawyers, and contact powerful connections to influence the case in their favor.

An accused with economic disadvantage often faces legal costs in addition to the crime she is accused of. While guaranteed a qualified defense, many public defense attorneys are overworked and may not have the time or resources available compared to an elite private lawyer. Thus, the rich are often able to achieve favorable outcomes where a less wealthy defendant cannot, leading to another societal bias that is difficult to correct. The judicial system was set up to guarantee all citizens due process: the full and fair conduct of trials. This protects the legal and personal rights of citizens and prevents the state or government from arbitrarily denying these rights to individuals. For example, a person charged with murder cannot be sent to prison without due process, that is, without conducting a fair trial before a jury of peers. In your opinion, what was the crucial point for the company to integrate you into the management of the company? I`m sure my background and experience played a role. I have worked in government affairs, in private practice and as in-house counsel. My willingness to contribute is another factor. When I joined the firm, we were only working in the area of personal injury and bankruptcy. I have been in employment law for almost 10 years, so a few months after I started, I prepared a proposal for the management team so that we could build an employment law practice.

I was always ready to take on a new project or try to help someone solve a problem. Another strength is the fact that while the judges preside over the court, it is a jury composed of the defendant`s colleagues that will make the decision.